WebOct 27, 2024 · Besides Git merge being a common operation when merging one branch into another, there are these two popular flags bamboozling developers: --ff or so-called fast … WebA no-fast-forward merge after rebasing makes an empty merge commit, even though a feature branch could have fast-forwarded. You can do that with git merge --no-ff: # After rebase: A---B---C main \ D---E---F feature # After merge --no-ff: A---B---C-----------G main \ / D---E---F feature. Now the history is effectively linear – there’s no ...
My New Best Friend: git merge --no-ff · Jonathan Oliver
WebGit history shows the difference between using `--ff` and `--no-ff` when performing a merge. - GitHub - tyler-eon/ff-vs-noff: Git history shows the difference between using `--ff` and ` … Webmerge.ff . By default, Git does not create an extra merge commit when merging a commit that is a descendant of the current commit. Instead, the tip of the current branch is fast-forwarded. When set to false, this variable tells Git to create an extra merge commit in such a case (equivalent to giving the --no-ff option from oswego technology education
Git fast-forward merge - why you should turn it off
WebOct 5, 2024 · The --no-ff option is only useful if you want the history of the feature branch preserved. It sounds like this is just unnecessary clutter for your team. Don't feel like you … WebAug 31, 2011 · The "no-ff" stands for "no fast forward". The whole idea is that each time you do something, you to keep its identity and know that it came as a result of a particular bug. If you merge and you do so by fast forwarding, that context has been lost. WebAug 31, 2011 · Enter "git merge –no-ff". The "no-ff" stands for "no fast forward". The whole idea is that each time you do something, you to keep its identity and know that it came as … oswego tea bee balm